Food at all costs.

Food should be “tasty. If it is not tasty, there is no pleasure. When we eat good food, we are all in a good mood. They are always smiling. This seems to be the source of good health. 　We think that it is the mouth that demands good food, but in fact, it is the whole body that is demanding it. That seems to be the idea. The mind is also a member of the body, and it is always idealized as a source of pleasure. As long as this mind enjoys itself, even the slightest error in any other way seems to be offset. 　Even if we talk about calories or vitamins, those who have come of age and have learned freedom do not necessarily accept them as the joy of the heart. No matter how famous a food may be, it will not provide sufficient nourishment if it is not first a food that one likes and prefers. Therefore, no matter how much others may say 　If you do not like it, it is of no value to you. 　The sake that others love to drink may be a blessing in disguise or the best of all medicines, but it is worthless to those who do not like it. Cigarettes are another example of this. It is a poison that is detrimental to one’s health.

If people could enjoy three meals a day and three meals a day with all the things they love all their lives, they would have nothing to complain about. However, in reality, most of us endure a diet that is far removed from the gastronomical delights that we desire. Or, because they are insensitive, they are careless. Either of these is the case. 　It is a pity that there are people of considerable wealth who are ignorant of the freedom of food. And we should not overlook the fact that these people are usually suffering from some kind of chronic disease. However, as Confucius said 　It is true what Confucius said, “A man is only as good as the food he eats and drinks, and a man is only as good as his taste buds. 　When I was a young man, I remember saying, “No one, not even the king of a country, who has mastered the art and food, understands the art and knows how to eat. 　There are many people in the world who are well versed in pharmaceuticals and who are enthusiastic about medical treatment after illness, but it is not easy to find those who have set their goal as health and continue to cry out for the freedom of eating three times a day, three times a day. They are simply following the world’s ways and letting food without individuality, or in other words, food that is like poultry, determine the rest of their lives. The ideal is to choose one’s own favorite food and continue to eat delicious food three times a day, but people regard this as a sin, a nuisance, or even a heretic, and continue to practice a perverse custom that does not allow free appetite. However, this is a health issue that should be considered in depth, and freedom of appetite should be allowed.

However, in the real world, the answer is incomplete, even if there are people who want to eat what they want to eat. It ends up with whatever is fine. There are numerous 　We are not sufficiently familiar with “good” food. We are always 　There are probably a thousand kinds of food that we constantly praise and eat. If one were to examine them in detail, there must be as many as 10,000 varieties. However, the number of foods that the general public constantly consumes is at most fifty or a hundred. This is an astonishing indifference. It seems that all households are generally picky eaters. If those involved in the recently popular nutritional medicine were to become more familiar with food and cooking, more life would be added to the test tube, and today’s abuse that nutritional food is not tasty would naturally dissipate and contribute to improving the health of the Japanese people. 　Anyway, three times a day, three times a meal 　It is not worthwhile to eat three times a day unless it tastes good.

However 　However, there are different levels of “deliciousness,” and each person’s sense of taste is innately different, so we cannot make a blanket judgment. Because of the difference in age, it is not possible to say whether something is tasty or tasteless in general. We have no choice but to judge the food according to who said it was good or bad. 　It is not possible for everyone to know whether art or food is good or bad, so it is necessary to consider this matter carefully. In fact, Japanese cuisine, which many people mistakenly believe to be easy to learn, is not easy to master and, therefore, not easy to cook. It is impossible for anyone today, except for a few tea masters, to cook Japanese cuisine at home as if it were Japanese cuisine in earnest. The level of radio cooking is so different from that of the teacher and the students, that they are nothing more than a mere existence without treatment as it is now. Japanese cuisine, which has been perverted since the beginning of the Meiji era, should reflect on its past and fundamentally change its views. In short, good and bad can be determined by the colors we see with our eyes, the aroma we smell with our nose, and the taste we taste with our palate, but I believe that those who lack sufficient experience, those who dare not feel responsibility, those who are totally insensitive, and those who lack sincerity are the root cause of poisoning. I wish to change this perverse practice of treating food ingredients lightly.

However, as long as the current situation continues to be left to the formalistic crackdowns of government officials who have no regard for the quality of food ingredients, there will be no hope of eliminating the number of poisoning cases. In this respect, fine cuisine is a safe bet. This is because the emphasis is on the quality and freshness of the ingredients. In purchasing, the high and low prices are not a concern. 　I have listened carefully to radio cooking for many years, and I have never found a lecturer, male or female, who is worth listening to. I can almost guess that all of them have learned from poor cooks, no matter what kind of family they grew up in or what kind of culinary background they have, and the fact is that even the living ingredients, because of the unnecessary effort, spoil the taste and are not free from culinary ignorance. I am bombarded with nutritional and economic knowledge on a daily basis. 　I am told that the food has to be “delicious. I have never encountered a story of this delicious food.

I have never met a story of a dish that was “delicious,” especially when it was accompanied by 　I can say that there is no such thing as a “dish with beauty. In short, not a single intellectual 　In short, the reason for this is that none of the intellectuals know anything about beauty. 　The fact that no one who has a taste for cuisine and furnishings and has studied them to the point of discernment has emerged cannot be called a mystery. 　It is an old saying that good tableware and furnishings make food taste better. Most people must have heard this saying, but there is no tendency to actually study it. This is a regrettable trend. Although there is a distinction between the rich and the unaffluent, if one is interested in cooking for the enjoyment of the mind, he or she can make a beautiful and rich dish that will lead the mind to enjoyment through his or her own ingenuity.